1/1
14 files

Successful predatory avoidance behaviour to lion auditory cues during soft-release from captivity in cheetah

dataset
posted on 17.09.2021, 13:11 by Nynke Wemer, Vincent NaudeVincent Naude, Vincent van der Merwe, Marna Smit, Gerhard de Lange, Jan Komdeur

Due to global biodiversity declines, conservation programs have increasingly had to consider the value of reintroducing captive animals into the wild. However, reintroductions often fail as captive individuals may be naïve to predators and do not recognize or respond timeously to predatory cues, contributing to high mortality rates soon after release. This study evaluates differences in predator response behaviours between individuals from captive, semi-wild (i.e., raised in captivity and successfully released) and wild populations of cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) to an artificially simulated auditory threat of lions (Panthera leo), a larger, natural predator in South Africa. Such comparisons improve our understanding of differences between captive and wild behaviours and provide an aspect to evaluating the relative success of soft-release programs. Changes in the proximal distance, the latency of approach and hesitation toward both control (African bush cricket) and treatment (lion) auditory cues were observed for 29 cheetah from captive, semi-wild and wild populations in at least three trail replicates. Overall, captive individuals consistently displayed poor predatory response behaviours, approaching the treatment as often as the control, spending time near the stimulus (<10m) and often hesitating. Whereas both semi-wild and wild individuals could distinguish between the control and treatment, consistently fleeing from the latter, with little hesitation. Repeatability analyses indicated that these behavioural responses to predatory cues could not be explained by individual personality and between-trial learning comparisons showed no evidence of habituation. Our findings demonstrate how a priori testing for predator naïvety could inform future introductory decisions and thereby increase post-release survival rates, significantly improving the efficacy of reintroduction strategies. We, therefore, emphasize the importance of such research and screening in highly threatened species, such as cheetah, where reintroduction from captivity has become a necessary consideration.

Funding

Ashia

History

Department/Unit

Biological Sciences